论文标题
研究工资不平等与劳动力市场机构的相关性
Examining the correlation of the level of wage inequality with labor market institutions
论文作者
论文摘要
技术变革造成劳动力市场的重大变化。技术变革的后代之一是SBTC,这是许多经济学家对工资不平等增加的主要原因。然而,尽管技术变革也影响了大多数发达国家的影响,但是,工资不平等的增加水平并不相似。遵循SBTC理论的预测,不同水平的不平等可能是由于经济之间的技能不平等程度不同,这可能是由于可用熟练工人数量的差异引起的。但是,最近的研究表明,上面提到的差异可以解释一小部分国家之间的差异。因此,大多数由此产生的不平等可能是由于每个劳动力市场中更高水平的技能水平的不同方式造成的。本文主张的立场是,在所有国家都没有太多逆转的情况下,技术变革在很大程度上给予了技术变革。因此,为了说明导致工资不平等的工资分配结构的变化,我们需要了解技术如何影响劳动力市场机构。从这种意义上讲,技术进步造成的薪酬不平等并不是我们被动地接受的现象。相反,认识到结构和劳动力市场机构的功能在很大程度上受到机构对技术变革的反应方式的影响,我们可以理解甚至扭转这种潜在的工资不平等。
Technological change is responsible for major changes in the labor market. One of the offspring of technological change is the SBTC, which is for many economists the leading cause of the increasing wage inequality. However, despite that the technological change affected similarly the majority of the developed countries, nevertheless, the level of the increase of wage inequality wasn't similar. Following the predictions of the SBTC theory, the different levels of inequality could be due to varying degrees of skill inequality between economies, possibly caused by variations in the number of skilled workers available. However, recent research shows that the difference mentioned above can explain a small percentage of the difference between countries. Therefore, most of the resulting inequality could be due to the different ways in which the higher level of skills is valued in each labor market. The position advocated in this article is that technological change is largely given for all countries without much scope to reverse. Therefore, in order to illustrate the changes in the structure of wage distribution that cause wage inequality, we need to understand how technology affects labor market institutions.In this sense, the pay inequality caused by technological progress is not a phenomenon we passively accept. On the contrary, recognizing that the structure and the way labor market institutions function is largely influenced by the way institutions respond to technological change, we can understand and maybe reverse this underlying wage inequality.