论文标题
建议系统的深度神经审查文本互动
Deep Neural Review Text Interaction for Recommendation Systems
论文作者
论文摘要
用户的评论包含有价值的信息,这些信息在大多数推荐系统中均未考虑到这些信息。根据该领域的最新研究,使用评论文本不仅可以提高建议的性能,而且还可以减轻数据稀疏的影响并有助于解决冷启动问题。在本文中,我们提出了一个神经推荐模型,该模型通过利用用户评论来推荐项目。为了预测每个项目的用户评分,我们的建议模型(名为Matchpyramid pefumender System(MPRS))代表每个用户和项目及其相应的评论文本。因此,推荐问题被视为文本匹配问题,因此从匹配的用户获得的匹配分数和项目文本可以被视为其相似性的联合范围的良好代表。为了解决文本匹配问题,灵感来自Matchpyramid(Pang,2016年),我们采用了一种基于交互的方法,根据该方法,给定了一对输入文本,构造了匹配矩阵。随后,具有层次匹配模式的属性属性匹配矩阵,然后将其送入卷积神经网络(CNN),以计算给定的用户项目对的匹配分数。我们对亚马逊评论数据集的小型数据类别的实验表明,与DeepConn模型相比,我们提出的模型从1.76%到21.72%的相对改善,而与TransNets模型相比,相对改善的相对改善为0.83%至3.15%。同样,与DEEPCONN模型相比,在两个大类别(即AZ-CSJ和AZ-MOV)上,我们的模型可实现8.08%和7.56%的相对改善,而与Transnets模型相比,相对改善分别为1.74%和0.86%。
Users' reviews contain valuable information which are not taken into account in most recommender systems. According to the latest studies in this field, using review texts could not only improve the performance of recommendation, but it can also alleviate the impact of data sparsity and help to tackle the cold start problem. In this paper, we present a neural recommender model which recommends items by leveraging user reviews. In order to predict user rating for each item, our proposed model, named MatchPyramid Recommender System (MPRS), represents each user and item with their corresponding review texts. Thus, the problem of recommendation is viewed as a text matching problem such that the matching score obtained from matching user and item texts could be considered as a good representative of their joint extent of similarity. To solve the text matching problem, inspired by MatchPyramid (Pang, 2016), we employed an interaction-based approach according to which a matching matrix is constructed given a pair of input texts. The matching matrix, which has the property of hierarchical matching patterns, is then fed into a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to compute the matching score for the given user-item pair. Our experiments on the small data categories of Amazon review dataset show that our proposed model gains from 1.76% to 21.72% relative improvement compared to DeepCoNN model, and from 0.83% to 3.15% relative improvement compared to TransNets model. Also, on two large categories, namely AZ-CSJ and AZ-Mov, our model achieves relative improvements of 8.08% and 7.56% compared to the DeepCoNN model, and relative improvements of 1.74% and 0.86% compared to the TransNets model, respectively.