论文标题

不同宇宙射线传输模型对星系形成的影响

Effects of Different Cosmic Ray Transport Models on Galaxy Formation

论文作者

Hopkins, Philip F., Chan, T. K., Squire, Jonathan, Quataert, Eliot, Ji, Suoqing, Keres, Dusan, Faucher-Giguere, Claude-Andre

论文摘要

具有〜GEV能量的宇宙射线(CRS)可以显着促进星际,近代和绘图培养基的能量和压力预算(ISM,CGM,IGM)。最近的宇宙学模拟已经开始探索这些影响,但是几乎所有研究都局限于具有恒定的CR扩散率和/或流速度的简化模型。通过外部湍流和自激发波的CR传播/散射的物理模型预测了局部等离子体特性的复杂功能的传输系数。在同伴论文中,我们考虑了广泛的观察性约束,以识别提出的物理动机的宇宙射线传播量表,这些量表满足了详细的银河系(MW)和半乳酸外$γ$ ray-ray的约束。在这里,我们比较了这些模型相对于简单的“扩散+流”模型对通过MW质量尺度在矮人的星系和CGM属性的效果。物理模型预测Cr扩散率的局部变化很大,中位扩散率随着以半乳酸半径的形式增加,并且随着星系质量和红移的减少。这些效应导致CGM中CR能量密度的降低更快(与较简单的模型相比),进而导致CRS对星系星形成速率(SFRS),CGM吸收曲线和银河流出的影响较弱。更物理的CR模型的预测往往“在”模型之间,这些模型完全忽略了CRS和以恒定扩散率处理CRS的模型。

Cosmic rays (CRs) with ~GeV energies can contribute significantly to the energy and pressure budget in the interstellar, circumgalactic, and intergalactic medium (ISM, CGM, IGM). Recent cosmological simulations have begun to explore these effects, but almost all studies have been restricted to simplified models with constant CR diffusivity and/or streaming speeds. Physical models of CR propagation/scattering via extrinsic turbulence and self-excited waves predict transport coefficients which are complicated functions of local plasma properties. In a companion paper, we consider a wide range of observational constraints to identify proposed physically-motivated cosmic-ray propagation scalings which satisfy both detailed Milky Way (MW) and extra-galactic $γ$-ray constraints. Here, we compare the effects of these models relative to simpler 'diffusion+streaming' models on galaxy and CGM properties at dwarf through MW mass scales. The physical models predict large local variations in CR diffusivity, with median diffusivity increasing with galacto-centric radii and decreasing with galaxy mass and redshift. These effects lead to a more rapid dropoff of CR energy density in the CGM (compared to simpler models), in turn producing weaker effects of CRs on galaxy star formation rates (SFRs), CGM absorption profiles and galactic outflows. The predictions of the more physical CR models tend to lie 'in between' models which ignore CRs entirely and models which treat CRs with constant diffusivity.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源