论文标题
潮汐流量下的光网络中的公平资源分配
Fair Resource Allocation in Optical Networks under Tidal Traffic
论文作者
论文摘要
我们建议在建模的潮汐流量下为可重构弹性光网络的alpha-fair路由和频谱分配(RSA)框架,该框架基于由标量alpha(不等式aversion Aversion aversion参数)参数的社交福利函数的最大化。目的是近似于平等的频谱分配(SA),该频谱分配(SA)可以最大程度地利用网络资源争夺的所有连接的最小SA,从而从广泛使用的功利主义SA转移,而这些SA仅使网络效率最大化。 A set of existing metrics are examined (i.e., connection blocking, resource utilization, coefficient of variation (CV) of utilities), and a set of new measures are also introduced (i.e., improvement on connection over- (COP) and under-provisioning (CUP), CV of unserved traffic), allowing a network operator to derive and evaluate in advance a set of alpha-fair RSA solutions and select the one that best fits单个连接和整个网络的性能要求。我们表明,与功利主义分配相比,同时可以显着提高COP(最高20%)和杯(高达80%),可以更好地利用网络资源,同时获得零阻止。重要的是,公用事业和未经保存的流量的简历表明,与分配给连接的公用事业数量最公平的SA并不意味着SA相对于可实现的连接QoS,而平等主义者SA更好地近似于最公平的SA。
We propose an alpha-fair routing and spectrum allocation (RSA) framework for reconfigurable elastic optical networks under modeled tidal traffic, that is based on the maximization of the social welfare function parameterized by a scalar alpha (the inequality aversion parameter). The objective is to approximate an egalitarian spectrum allocation (SA) that maximizes the minimum possible SA over all connections contending for the network resources, shifting from the widely used utilitarian SA that merely maximizes the network efficiency. A set of existing metrics are examined (i.e., connection blocking, resource utilization, coefficient of variation (CV) of utilities), and a set of new measures are also introduced (i.e., improvement on connection over- (COP) and under-provisioning (CUP), CV of unserved traffic), allowing a network operator to derive and evaluate in advance a set of alpha-fair RSA solutions and select the one that best fits the performance requirements of both the individual connections and the overall network. We show that an egalitarian SA better utilizes the network resources by significantly improving both COP (up to 20%) and CUP (up to 80%), compared to the utilitarian allocation, while attaining zero blocking. Importantly, the CVs of utilities and unserved traffic indicate that a SA that is fairest with respect to the amount of utilities allocated to the connections does not imply that the SA is also fairest with respect to the achievable QoS of the connections, while an egalitarian SA better approximates a fairest QoS-based SA.