论文标题
恒星形成时间尺度,来自星空学和化学丰度的光环群体
Star Formation Timescales of the Halo Populations from Asteroseismology and Chemical Abundances
论文作者
论文摘要
我们在\ -2.5 <[\ mathrm {{fe}}/{h}}}}范围内,在\ textit {kepler}字段中结合了26个光环红色巨型分支星星的26个光环红色巨型分支星的运动学分析和运动学分析。将理论动机的校正应用于地震缩放关系后,我们获得了$ 0.97 \ pm 0.03 \,\ mathrm {m _ {\ odot}} $的平均质量,以供光环样本。尽管这映射到$ \ sim 7 \,\ mathrm {gyr} $的年龄,显着年轻,比银河系恒星光环的独立年龄估计值大得多,但我们考虑到这个年轻的年龄是由于缩放关系中恒星质量的高估。低红色巨型分支星星($ \ log g> 2 $)之间没有显着的质量分散,它将相对年龄分散限制在$ <18 \%$,对应于$ <2 \,\ m athrm {gyr} $。精确的化学丰度使我们能够将星星与[{fe}/{h}] $> -1.7 $分为两个[{mg}/{fe}]组。虽然[$α$/{fe}]和[{eu}/{mg}]的比率在两个子样本之间是不同的,但[$ s $/eu],其中$ s $代表BA,LA,LA,CE和ND,并没有显示显着差异。这些丰度比表明,低毫克人群的化学演化是由超新星型造成的,但不是通过低到中间的批量渐近巨型分支明星的贡献,对其星形分层的限制为$ 100 \,\ m mathrm {mathrm {mathrm {myr} <τ°\τ<300 \,\ \ \ \ \ \ m mathrm} $ {myrm {myr} $ {myr} $。我们也没有检测到两个[{mg}/{fe}]组之间的任何显着质量差异,因此表明它们的形成时期的分离不超过1.5 Gyr。
We combine asteroseismology, optical high-resolution spectroscopy, and kinematic analysis for 26 halo red giant branch stars in the \textit{Kepler} field in the range of $-2.5<[\mathrm{{Fe}/{H}}]<-0.6$. After applying theoretically motivated corrections to the seismic scaling relations, we obtain an average mass of $0.97\pm 0.03\,\mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ for our sample of halo stars. Although this maps into an age of $\sim 7\,\mathrm{Gyr}$, significantly younger than independent age estimates of the Milky Way stellar halo, we considerer this apparently young age is due to the overestimation of stellar mass in the scaling relations. There is no significant mass dispersion among lower red giant branch stars ($\log g>2$), which constrains a relative age dispersion to $<18\%$, corresponding to $<2\,\mathrm{Gyr}$. The precise chemical abundances allow us to separate the stars with [{Fe}/{H}]$>-1.7$ into two [{Mg}/{Fe}] groups. While [$α$/{Fe}] and [{Eu}/{Mg}] ratios are different between the two subsamples, [$s$/Eu], where $s$ stands for Ba, La, Ce, and Nd, does not show a significant difference. These abundance ratios suggest that the chemical evolution of the low-Mg population is contributed by type~Ia supernovae, but not by low-to-intermediate mass asymptotic giant branch stars, providing a constraint on its star formation timescale as $100\,\mathrm{Myr}<τ<300\,\mathrm{Myr}$. We also do not detect any significant mass difference between the two [{Mg}/{Fe}] groups, thus suggesting that their formation epochs are not separated by more than 1.5 Gyr.