论文标题
在Covid-19期间的学校教学计划
Planning of School Teaching during COVID-19
论文作者
论文摘要
由于19日,有超过10亿的学生出学了,被迫进行了几个缺点,并已急忙安排的远程学习;此外,大多数国家目前不确定如何计划2020-2021学年的学校活动;所有这些使学习和教育成为当前大流行的世界上最大的世界问题。不幸的是,由于Covid-19的孵化期的长度,学校的全部开放似乎是不切实际的,直到可以使用疫苗为止。为了支持某些面对面学习的可能性,我们研究了由于开放而引起的流行病扩散的数学模型,并评估旨在通过学校活动造成的额外COVID-19案件的计划,同时确保足够的课堂学习期。我们考虑具有外部感染源和合适损失功能的Seair模型;选择现实的参数选择后,我们通过模拟退火来数字确定最佳的学校开放策略。事实证明,混合模型几乎具有周期性的课堂和远程教学天或几周的交替,通常是最佳的。除了含有共同19的扩散外,这些解决方案在教学上也可以接受,并且也可能成为整个社会的驾驶模型。在一个典型的例子中,最佳策略导致学校在200天内开放90天,与学校相关的个体中的Covid-19案例数量增加了约66%,而不是大约250%的增长,这将是全面开放的结果。
More than one billion students are out of school because of Covid-19, forced to a remote learning that has several drawbacks and has been hurriedly arranged; in addition, most countries are currently uncertain on how to plan school activities for the 2020-2021 school year; all of this makes learning and education some of the biggest world issues of the current pandemic. Unfortunately, due to the length of the incubation period of Covid-19, full opening of schools seems to be impractical till a vaccine is available. In order to support the possibility of some in-person learning, we study a mathematical model of the diffusion of the epidemic due to school opening, and evaluate plans aimed at containing the extra Covid-19 cases due to school activities while ensuring an adequate number of in-class learning periods. We consider a SEAIR model with an external source of infection and a suitable loss function; after a realistic parameter selection, we numerically determine optimal school opening strategies by simulated annealing. It turns out that blended models, with almost periodic alternations of in-class and remote teaching days or weeks, are generally optimal. Besides containing Covid-19 diffusion, these solutions could be pedagogically acceptable, and could also become a driving model for the society at large. In a prototypical example, the optimal strategy results in the school opening 90 days out of 200 with the number of Covid-19 cases among the individuals related to the school increasing by about 66%, instead of the about 250% increase that would have been a consequence of full opening.