论文标题
当我们谈论数据物理性时,我们谈论的是什么
What we talk about when we talk about data physicality
论文作者
论文摘要
数据物理化“将数据映射到物理形式”,但是许多规范示例并不基于数据集。为了解决这一矛盾,我认为物理化的实践迫使我们重新考虑传统的数据概念。本文提出了一个概念框架,以检查物理化与数据的关系。本文开发了一个二维概念空间,用于比较从设计理论和批判数据研究文献中借鉴物理化中使用的数据的不同观点。一个轴区分了认识论和本体论的观点,重点是数据与思想之间的关系。第二轴区分了数据与世界的关系,区分代表性和关系观点。为了阐明这些不同观点的美学和概念含义,本文讨论了连续空间的每个象限的数据物理化示例。它进一步使用该框架来检查物理文献中有关数据的明确和隐式假设。作为一份理论论文,它鼓励从业人员思考数据与他们试图捕获的表现和现象的关系。它邀请探索数据与世界之间的关系,作为创造性张力的产生来源。
Data physicalizations "map data to physical form," yet many canonical examples are not based on data sets. To address this contradiction, I argue that the practice of physicalization forces us to rethink traditional notions of data. This paper proposes a conceptual framework to examine how physicalizations relate to data. This paper develops a two-dimensional conceptual space for comparing different perspectives on data used in physicalization, drawing from design theory and critical data studies literature. One axis distinguishes between epistemological and ontological perspectives, focusing on the relationship between data and the mind. The second axis distinguishes how data relate to the world, differentiating between representational and relational perspectives. To clarify the aesthetic and conceptual implications of these different perspectives, the paper discusses examples of data physicalization for each quadrant of the continuous space. It further uses the framework to examine the explicit and implicit assumptions about data in physicalization literature. As a theoretical paper, it encourages practitioners to think about how data relate to the manifestations and the phenomena they try to capture. It invites exploration of the relationship between data and the world as a generative source of creative tension.