论文标题

在经过改进的爱因斯坦 - 拉布上和改良的CHU光学配方

On the Modified Einstein-Laub and Modified Chu Optical Force Formulations

论文作者

Mahdy, M. R. C., Zhang, Tianhang, Al-Quaderi, Golam Dastegir, Rivy, Hamim Mahmud, Kianinejad, Amin

论文摘要

在涉及材料背景的几种实验中,已经观察到光学力的Chu,Einstein-Laub和Ampere配方导致不同的光学作用力或错误的总光学力。为了确定这种重大分歧的确切原因,我们研究了许多拖拉机束和横向力实验中的光学力。我们证明,从两个数学计算的数学一致性条件获得的经过修改的爱因斯坦 - 拉布或改良的chu制剂给出了与实验一致的时间平均力。我们考虑嵌入复杂材料背景的手性和精神对象。尽管在这项工作中已经在数学上等同于光学的明显表述。这些独特的光学配方的物理一致性方面也已经进行了研究。众所周知,Minkowski的理论表明,在无损对象内部,我们仍然没有任何实验验证。相比之下,经过修改的爱因斯坦 - 拉布(Einstein-laub)和改良的CHU力配方都表明,无损物体内部的非散装力。因此,对于将来解决这种差异的情况,我们还提出了一个可能的实验,以研究大量力并检查这些不同表述的有效性。

In several experiments involving material background, it has been observed that the Chu, Einstein-Laub and Ampere formulations of optical force lead to either different optical forces or wrong total optical force. In order to identify the exact reason behind such significant disagreements, we investigate the optical force in a number of tractor beam and lateral force experiments. We demonstrate that the modified Einstein-Laub or modified Chu formulations, obtained from two mathematical consistency conditions of force calculation, give the time-averaged force that agrees with the experiments. We consider both the chiral and achiral objects embedded in complex material backgrounds. Though the distinct formulations of optical force have been made mathematically equivalent in this work; the aspect of physical consistency of these distinct optical force formulations have also been investigated. It is known that the theory of Minkowski suggests zero bulk force inside a lossless object for which we still do not have any experimental verification. In contrast, both modified Einstein-Laub and modified Chu force formulations suggest non-zero bulk force inside a lossless object. Hence, for a future resolution of this discrepancy, we also suggest a possible experiment to investigate the bulk force and to check the validity of these distinct formulations.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源