论文标题
金绿色和黑色开放访问差异很大的情况:印度研究产出的证据
The Case of Significant Variations in Gold-Green and Black Open Access: Evidence from Indian Research Output
论文作者
论文摘要
在过去的十年中,全世界的开放访问已成为全球重要的运动。现在有几项举措说服研究人员在开放访问期刊上发表,并在存储库中归档其预印版本或后印刷版本。机构和资助机构还在促进使研究产出作为开放访问的方法。本文通过计算分析从印度的Web of Science在过去五年(2014-2018)获得的研究出版物数据来着眼于印度的开放访问水平和模式。还获得和分析了来自其他连接平台的相应数据 - Unmaywall和Sci-Hub。获得的结果表明,在过去五年中,约有24%的印度研究成果有法律形式的开放式访问,而世界平均约为30%。与绿色和青铜相比,金黄色开放访问中有更多文章。相反,来自印度的研究产出中有90%以上可以在SCI-HUB中免费下载。我们还发现了开放访问中的纪律差异,但是令人惊讶的是,对于金绿色和黑色开放访问表格而言,这些模式不同。科幻中心似乎正在补充法律金绿色的开放式通道,以使其中等学科。发现印度的中央机构存储库的存储量很低。
Open Access has emerged as an important movement worldwide during the last decade. There are several initiatives now that persuade researchers to publish in open access journals and to archive their pre- or post-print versions of papers in repositories. Institutions and funding agencies are also promoting ways to make research outputs available as open access. This paper looks at open access levels and patterns in research output from India by computationally analyzing research publication data obtained from Web of Science for India for the last five years (2014-2018). The corresponding data from other connected platforms -- Unpaywall and Sci-Hub -- are also obtained and analyzed. The results obtained show that about 24% of research output from India, during last five years, is available in legal forms of open access as compared to world average of about 30%. More articles are available in gold open access as compared to green and bronze. On the contrary, more than 90% of the research output from India is available for free download in Sci-Hub. We also found disciplinary differentiation in open access, but surprisingly these patterns are different for gold-green and black open access forms. Sci-Hub appears to be complementing the legal gold-green open access for less covered disciplines in them. The central institutional repositories in India are found to have low volume of research papers deposited.