论文标题

使用基于方案的预测模型了解受控的电动汽车充电影响

Understanding controlled EV charging impacts using scenario-based forecasting models

论文作者

Roy, Rahul, Dokka, Trivikram, Ellis, David A., Dudek, Esther, Barnfather, Paul

论文摘要

传输电气化是减少碳排放的关键策略。许多国家采用了对电动汽车(EV)进行完整但逐步转换的政策。但是,质量电动汽车的采用也意味着负载(kW)的飙升,这反过来又可能破坏现有的电力基础设施。智能或受控的充电被广泛视为缓解对现有网络的压力的潜在解决方案。从英国和其他地方的EV试验中学习,我们考虑了两个关键方面,这些方面在当前的研究中很大程度上被忽略了:EV在任何给定时间和广泛的电动汽车类型范围内实际充电,尤其是电池容量。采用基于简约的方案方法,我们研究了平均数量活跃充电器数量的预测模型和用于不同场景的平均EV消耗。专注于住宅充电模型,我们考虑的范围从简单的回归模型到更先进的机器和Xgboost和LSTM等深度学习模型。然后,我们使用这些模型来评估不同水平的未来EV渗透对捕获典型现实世界情景的样品分布变压器的影响。这样,当无法完全控制的充电时,我们还启动了不同类型的受控充电的研究。这与最近的试验结果相吻合,这些试验表明,相当一部分电动汽车所有者可能不喜欢完全控制的集中式充电。我们研究了两个可能的控制制度,并表明从转变器的负载观点中更有益,而另一个则可能是其他目标。我们表明,至少需要60%的控制,以确保在高峰时段的变压器不会超载。

Electrification of transport is a key strategy in reducing carbon emissions. Many countries have adopted policies of complete but gradual transformation to electric vehicles (EVs). However, mass EV adoption also means a spike in load (kW), which in turn can disrupt existing electricity infrastructure. Smart or controlled charging is widely seen as a potential solution to alleviate this stress on existing networks. Learning from the recent EV trials in the UK and elsewhere we take into account two key aspects which are largely ignored in current research: EVs actually charging at any given time and wide range of EV types, especially battery capacity-wise. Taking a minimalistic scenario-based approach, we study forecasting models for mean number of active chargers and mean EV consumption for distinct scenarios. Focusing on residential charging the models we consider range from simple regression models to more advanced machine and deep learning models such as XGBoost and LSTMs. We then use these models to evaluate the impacts of different levels of future EV penetration on a specimen distribution transformer that captures typical real-world scenarios. In doing so, we also initiate the study of different types of controlled charging when fully controlled charging is not possible. This aligns with the outcomes from recent trials which show that a sizeable proportion of EV owners may not prefer fully controlled centralized charging. We study two possible control regimes and show that one is more beneficial from load-on-transformer point of view, while the other may be preferred for other objectives. We show that a minimum of 60% control is required to ensure that transformers are not overloaded during peak hours.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源