论文标题
解剖上下文信息是否改善了基于3D U-NET的脑肿瘤分割?
Does anatomical contextual information improve 3D U-Net based brain tumor segmentation?
论文作者
论文摘要
需要有效,健壮和自动的脑肿瘤分割工具,以提取有用的信息从磁共振(MR)图像中进行处理。上下文感知人工智能是开发用于计算机辅助医学图像分析的深度学习应用的新兴概念。在这项工作中,研究了以白质,灰质和脑脊液掩模的形式添加来自大脑解剖结构的上下文信息以及概率图可以改善基于U-NET的脑肿瘤分割。 BRATS2020数据集用于训练和测试两种标准的3D U-NET模型,除了传统的MR图像模式外,还使用解剖学上下文信息作为额外的频道,以二进制掩码(CIM)或概率图(CIP)的形式形式。还训练了仅使用常规MR图像模式的基线模型(BLM)。根据总体细分准确性,模型训练时间,域的概括以及每个受试者可用的MR模式的补偿,研究了添加上下文信息的影响。结果表明,即使比较基线模型和上下文信息模型之间的骰子得分时,即使在比较高级和低级肿瘤的性能时,也没有统计学上的显着差异。仅在为每个受试者提供的较少的MR模式的补偿时,才能添加解剖上下文信息,从而显着改善整个肿瘤的分割。总体而言,当以二进制掩码或概率图作为额外通道的形式使用解剖上下文信息时,分割性能总体上没有显着改善。
Effective, robust, and automatic tools for brain tumor segmentation are needed for the extraction of information useful in treatment planning from magnetic resonance (MR) images. Context-aware artificial intelligence is an emerging concept for the development of deep learning applications for computer-aided medical image analysis. In this work, it is investigated whether the addition of contextual information from the brain anatomy in the form of white matter, gray matter, and cerebrospinal fluid masks and probability maps improves U-Net-based brain tumor segmentation. The BraTS2020 dataset was used to train and test two standard 3D U-Net models that, in addition to the conventional MR image modalities, used the anatomical contextual information as extra channels in the form of binary masks (CIM) or probability maps (CIP). A baseline model (BLM) that only used the conventional MR image modalities was also trained. The impact of adding contextual information was investigated in terms of overall segmentation accuracy, model training time, domain generalization, and compensation for fewer MR modalities available for each subject. Results show that there is no statistically significant difference when comparing Dice scores between the baseline model and the contextual information models, even when comparing performances for high- and low-grade tumors independently. Only in the case of compensation for fewer MR modalities available for each subject did the addition of anatomical contextual information significantly improve the segmentation of the whole tumor. Overall, there is no overall significant improvement in segmentation performance when using anatomical contextual information in the form of either binary masks or probability maps as extra channels.