论文标题
专业知识和信心解释了社会影响如何沿着智力任务演变
Expertise and confidence explain how social influence evolves along intellective tasks
论文作者
论文摘要
在协作环境中发现个人影响力的先例是一个重要,实用且具有挑战性的问题。在本文中,我们研究了集体执行一系列智力任务的小组中的人际影响。我们观察到,按照反馈的序列,具有更高专业知识和社会信心的个人具有更高的人际影响力。我们还观察到,表现不佳的人倾向于低估其高性能队友的专业知识。基于这些观察结果,我们介绍了三个假设,并为其有效性提供了经验和理论支持。我们报告了有关交易记忆系统的长期理论,社会比较和对社会影响力起源的信心的经验证据。我们提出了一个受这些理论启发的认知动力学模型,以描述个人随着时间的推移调整人际影响的过程。我们证明了该模型在预测个人的影响力方面的准确性,并为其对案件的渐近行为提供了分析结果,并具有相同表现的个体。最后,我们提出了一种新的方法,使用深层神经网络在预测个体影响的预训练的文本嵌入模型上。使用消息内容,消息时间和在任务期间收集的个人正确性,我们能够准确预测个人随时间的自我报告的影响。与基线相比,与结构平衡和反映的评估模型相比,广泛的实验验证了所提出的模型的准确性。尽管神经网络模型是最准确的,但动力学模型是影响预测的最容易解释的。
Discovering the antecedents of individuals' influence in collaborative environments is an important, practical, and challenging problem. In this paper, we study interpersonal influence in small groups of individuals who collectively execute a sequence of intellective tasks. We observe that along an issue sequence with feedback, individuals with higher expertise and social confidence are accorded higher interpersonal influence. We also observe that low-performing individuals tend to underestimate their high-performing teammate's expertise. Based on these observations, we introduce three hypotheses and present empirical and theoretical support for their validity. We report empirical evidence on longstanding theories of transactive memory systems, social comparison, and confidence heuristics on the origins of social influence. We propose a cognitive dynamical model inspired by these theories to describe the process by which individuals adjust interpersonal influences over time. We demonstrate the model's accuracy in predicting individuals' influence and provide analytical results on its asymptotic behavior for the case with identically performing individuals. Lastly, we propose a novel approach using deep neural networks on a pre-trained text embedding model for predicting the influence of individuals. Using message contents, message times, and individual correctness collected during tasks, we are able to accurately predict individuals' self-reported influence over time. Extensive experiments verify the accuracy of the proposed models compared to baselines such as structural balance and reflected appraisal model. While the neural networks model is the most accurate, the dynamical model is the most interpretable for influence prediction.