论文标题
二级和较低本科教育的教学特殊相对论理论:文学评论
Teaching and learning special relativity theory in secondary and lower undergraduate education: A literature review
论文作者
论文摘要
这篇综述概述了二级和较低本科层面的特殊相对论理论研究体系(SRT)教育的概述和分析。目前,国际上对实施SRT在大学前教育中的兴趣越来越大,作为现代物理学的介绍。因此,需要在SRT教育中对学习机会和挑战的见解。 SRT教育研究领域仍处于早期阶段,尤其是在中学教育水平上,并且缺乏对学习成果的经验评估。为了指导未来的研究方向,到目前为止,需要概述和综合结果。我们已经选择了40篇文章,并根据报道的学习困难,教学方法和研究工具进行了分类。分析表明,所有教育水平的学生都会使用参考框架,SRT的假设和相对论效应经历学习困难。在报道的教学序列,教学材料和学习活动中,这些困难是从不同角度接触的。一些教学方法集中于思考实验以表达SRT的概念特征,而另一些教学方法则使用虚拟环境来提供相对论效应的现实可视化。从报道的教学方法中,可以确定三个学习目标:促进概念理解,培养对科学的历史和哲学的理解,并积极地对SRT和物理学的信心。为了定量比较不同教学策略的学习成果,需要对评估工具进行更全面的评估。
This review presents an overview and analysis of the body of research on special relativity theory (SRT) education at the secondary and lower undergraduate level. There is currently a growing international interest in implementing SRT in pre-university education as an introduction to modern physics. For this reason, insights into learning opportunities and challenges in SRT education are needed. The field of research in SRT education is still at an early stage, especially at the level of secondary education, and there is a shortage of empirical evaluation of learning outcomes. In order to guide future research directions, there is a need for an overview and synthesis of the results reported so far. We have selected 40 articles and categorized them according to reported learning difficulties, teaching approaches, and research tools. Analysis shows that students at all educational levels experience learning difficulties with the use of frames of reference, the postulates of SRT, and relativistic effects. In the reported teaching sequences, instructional materials, and learning activities, these difficulties are approached from different angles. Some teaching approaches focus on thought experiments to express conceptual features of SRT, while others use virtual environments to provide realistic visualization of relativistic effects. From the reported teaching approaches, three learning objectives can be identified: to foster conceptual understanding, to foster understanding of the history and philosophy of science, and to gain motivation and confidence toward SRT and physics in general. In order to quantitatively compare learning outcomes of different teaching strategies, a more thorough evaluation of assessment tools is required.