论文标题
深度卷积神经网络:基础的调查,选定的改进和一些当前的应用
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A survey of the foundations, selected improvements, and some current applications
论文作者
论文摘要
在机器学习的世界内,存在各种不同的方法,具有各自的优势和应用。本文旨在介绍和讨论一种这样的方法,即卷积神经网络(CNNS)。 CNN是深层神经网络,使用称为卷积的特殊线性操作。该操作代表了CNN的关键和独特元素,因此将成为该方法论文的重点。讨论始于基于卷积和CNN的理论基础。然后,讨论开始讨论一些可以改善该方法以估计更广泛功能类别的方法的改进和增强。该论文主要研究了两种改进方法的方法:通过使用本地连接的层,这可以使网络对翻译的不变性和瓷砖卷积的不变性,从而可以学习比标准卷积更复杂的不变性。此外,快速傅立叶变换的使用可以提高卷积的计算效率。随后,本文讨论了两种卷积的应用,这些应用在实践中被证明非常有效。首先,Yolo架构是用于图像对象分类的艺术神经网络的状态,该状态可以准确预测图像中对象周围的边界框。其次,可以使用CNN进行乳房X线摄影中的肿瘤检测,比实际医生的敏感性仅比实际的医生高7.2%。最后,在不同领域胜过人类的技术的发明也提出了一些简短讨论的道德和监管问题。
Within the world of machine learning there exists a wide range of different methods with respective advantages and applications. This paper seeks to present and discuss one such method, namely Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). CNNs are deep neural networks that use a special linear operation called convolution. This operation represents a key and distinctive element of CNNs, and will therefore be the focus of this method paper. The discussion starts with the theoretical foundations that underlie convolutions and CNNs. Then, the discussion proceeds to discuss some improvements and augmentations that can be made to adapt the method to estimate a wider set of function classes. The paper mainly investigates two ways of improving the method: by using locally connected layers, which can make the network less invariant to translation, and tiled convolution, which allows for the learning of more complex invariances than standard convolution. Furthermore, the use of the Fast Fourier Transform can improve the computational efficiency of convolution. Subsequently, this paper discusses two applications of convolution that have proven to be very effective in practice. First, the YOLO architecture is a state of the art neural network for image object classification, which accurately predicts bounding boxes around objects in images. Second, tumor detection in mammography may be performed using CNNs, accomplishing 7.2% higher specificity than actual doctors with only .3% less sensitivity. Finally, the invention of technology that outperforms humans in different fields also raises certain ethical and regulatory questions that are briefly discussed.