论文标题
Lagrangian ReadyTubes:下一代
Lagrangian Reachtubes: The Next Generation
论文作者
论文摘要
我们介绍了LRT-NG,这是一组技术和关联的工具集,该工具集计算非线性动态系统的ReachTube(在给定时间范围内对触发状态的过度透视)。 LRT-NG显着提高了最先进的Langrangian可达性及其相关的工具LRT。从理论的角度来看,LRT-NG在三种方面优于LRT。首先,它首次将经过分析计算的公制用于传播球,该指标被证明可以最大程度地减少球的体积。我们强调指标计算是所有基于腹胀技术的核心。其次,它将下一个触及量计算为两个球的交点:一个基于笛卡尔度量标准,另一个基于新指标。尽管这两个指标以前被认为是相反的方法,但它们的联合使用大大收紧了触及式尺寸。第三,它通过最佳吸收下一个球半径中的间隔近似,避免与触及中心的验证集成相关的“包装效果”。从工具开发的角度来看,LRT-NG在两种方面都优于LRT。首先,这是不再依赖CAPD的独立工具。这需要实现Lohner方法和Runge-Kutta时间传播方法。其次,它具有改进的接口,允许输入模型和初始条件作为外部输入文件提供。我们对包括两个神经ODE在内的全面基准测试的实验表明,与LRT,CAPD和Flow*相比,LRT-NG的性能优越。
We introduce LRT-NG, a set of techniques and an associated toolset that computes a reachtube (an over-approximation of the set of reachable states over a given time horizon) of a nonlinear dynamical system. LRT-NG significantly advances the state-of-the-art Langrangian Reachability and its associated tool LRT. From a theoretical perspective, LRT-NG is superior to LRT in three ways. First, it uses for the first time an analytically computed metric for the propagated ball which is proven to minimize the ball's volume. We emphasize that the metric computation is the centerpiece of all bloating-based techniques. Secondly, it computes the next reachset as the intersection of two balls: one based on the Cartesian metric and the other on the new metric. While the two metrics were previously considered opposing approaches, their joint use considerably tightens the reachtubes. Thirdly, it avoids the "wrapping effect" associated with the validated integration of the center of the reachset, by optimally absorbing the interval approximation in the radius of the next ball. From a tool-development perspective, LRT-NG is superior to LRT in two ways. First, it is a standalone tool that no longer relies on CAPD. This required the implementation of the Lohner method and a Runge-Kutta time-propagation method. Secondly, it has an improved interface, allowing the input model and initial conditions to be provided as external input files. Our experiments on a comprehensive set of benchmarks, including two Neural ODEs, demonstrates LRT-NG's superior performance compared to LRT, CAPD, and Flow*.