论文标题

现代科学的增长速度:一种潜在的分段增长曲线方法,用于模拟已建立和新文献数据库的发布数字

Growth rates of modern science: A latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases

论文作者

Bornmann, Lutz, Haunschild, Robin, Mutz, Ruediger

论文摘要

科学的成长是科学研究科学研究中的一个普遍问题。近年来,已经引入了两个新的书目数据库,可用于研究《几个世纪后代科学:数字科学和Microsoft Academic的维度》的成长过程。在这项研究中,我们使用了来自这些新数据库的出版数据,并从两个已建立的数据库(来自Elsevier的Clarivate Analytics和Scopus的Web Science)添加了出版数据,从现代科学系统开始到今天。我们估计了回归模型,其中包括四个数据库中的出版物计数。科学计算的不受限制增长的结果表明,总体增长率为4.10%,两倍的时间为17。3年。正如当前研究中各种分段回归模型的比较所揭示的那样,具有五个部分的模型最适合出版数据。我们证明,这些具有不同增长率的细分市场可以很好地解释,因为它们与经济阶段(例如工业化)和 /或政治发展(例如第二次世界大战)有关。在这项研究中,我们还分析了两个广泛领域(物理和技术科学以及生命科学)的科学增长以及英国科学和经济增长的关系。两个字段之间的比较仅显示出轻微的差异。英国经济和科学增长率的比较表明,经济增长率略低于科学增长率。

Growth of science is a prevalent issue in science of science studies. In recent years, two new bibliographic databases have been introduced which can be used to study growth processes in science from centuries back: Dimensions from Digital Science and Microsoft Academic. In this study, we used publication data from these new databases and added publication data from two established databases (Web of Science from Clarivate Analytics and Scopus from Elsevier) to investigate scientific growth processes from the beginning of the modern science system until today. We estimated regression models that included simultaneously the publication counts from the four databases. The results of the unrestricted growth of science calculations show that the overall growth rate amounts to 4.10% with a doubling time of 17.3 years. As the comparison of various segmented regression models in the current study revealed, the model with five segments fits the publication data best. We demonstrated that these segments with different growth rates can be interpreted very well, since they are related to either phases of economic (e.g., industrialization) and / or political developments (e.g., Second World War). In this study, we additionally analyzed scientific growth in two broad fields (Physical and Technical Sciences as well as Life Sciences) and the relationship of scientific and economic growth in UK. The comparison between the two fields revealed only slight differences. The comparison of the British economic and scientific growth rates showed that the economic growth rate is slightly lower than the scientific growth rate.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源