论文标题

2000 - 2011年化学工程世界科学生产的文献计量分析。第3部分:研究趋势和热门话题的分析

Bibliometric analysis of the world scientific production in Chemical Engineering during 2000-2011. Part 3: Analysis of research trends and hot topics

论文作者

Miranda, Ruben, Garcia-Carpintero, Esther

论文摘要

通过三项补充研究,使用了2000 - 2011年期间的Web Science数据库对化学工程领域的科学生产进行了全面的文献计量分析。第3部分分析了总科学生产和1,000名最被引用的出版物的文章标题,关键字Plus和作者关键字中的单词分布。已经确定了化学工程的主要领域;它们主要与化学反应工程有关,例如催化,反应器,动力学和单位操作,例如吸附。此外,该地区总共确定了十个热点:氢作为一种新的能量载体,废水处理,二氧化碳(捕获和隔离),光催化,光催化,纳米颗粒,生物柴油,纳米管,离子液体,离子液体,离子液体,先进的氧化过程,燃料氧化过程,生物细胞和燃料的生物元素(燃料材料),以均匀的物质(燃料材料)作为原始物质(原始物质)(原始的物质),并生成(燃料),并将其生成(燃料)生成(燃料),并生成(燃料),并将其生成(燃料)生成) ETC。)。获得的结果表明,通过最引用的出版物可以更轻松地分析主题领域和研究趋势,从而大大减少了这些分析所需的时间。文章标题中的单词,关键字Plus和作者关键字是互补的,但是,作者关键字被建议作为最有用数据的来源。与其他策略相比,作者关键字对于识别研究领域和趋势更有价值,要分析的单词总数较低。无论如何,作者建议对该地区专家获得的结果进行修订,以避免结果不准确并获取最有意义的信息。

A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the scientific production of Chemical Engineering area has been carried out using the Web of Science database for the period 2000-2011 through three complementary studies. Part 3 has analyzed the distribution of words in article titles, keyword plus and author keywords of both total scientific production and the 1,000 most cited publications. The main areas of Chemical Engineering have been identified; they are mainly related to chemical reaction engineering such as catalysis, reactors, kinetics, and unit operations such as adsorption. Furthermore, a total of ten hotspots in the area have been identified: hydrogen as a new energy vector, wastewater treatments, carbon dioxide (capture and sequestration), photocatalysis, nanoparticles, biodiesel, nanotubes, ionic liquids, advanced oxidation processes, membranes, fuel cells and the use of biomass as raw material (e.g. bioethanol, energy production, etc.). Results obtained suggest thematic areas and research trends can be easier analyzed through the most cited publications, decreasing significantly the time necessary for these analyses. Words in article title, keyword plus and author keywords are complementary, however, author keywords are suggested as the source of most useful data. Compared to other strategies, the author keywords are more valuable for identifying research areas and trends, and the total number of words to be analyzed is lower. Whatever the case, authors recommend a revision of the results obtained by experts in the area to avoid inaccurate results and get the most meaningful information.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源