论文标题
使用多级深卷积编码器网络对贫血RBC的语义分割
Semantic Segmentation of Anaemic RBCs Using Multilevel Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Network
论文作者
论文摘要
血液图像的像素级分析在诊断血液相关疾病,尤其是贫血方面起着关键作用。这些分析主要依赖于形态,大小和精确像素计数等形态畸形的准确诊断。在传统的分割方法中,已经采用了用于像素级分析的实例或基于对象的方法。卷积神经网络(CNN)模型需要一个具有详细像素级信息的大数据集,以在深度学习域中红细胞的语义分割。在当前的研究工作中,我们通过提出一个多层深度卷积编码器网络以及两个最先进的健康和厌食性RBC数据集来解决这些问题。提出的多级CNN模型保留了一层提取的像素级语义信息,然后传递到下一层以选择相关特征。这种现象有助于精确地对健康和肛门RBC元素的像素级计数以及形态分析。出于实验目的,我们提出了两个最先进的RBC数据集,即Healthy-RBC和Anaemic-RBCS数据集。每个数据集都包含1000张图像,地面真相面具,相关,完整的血液计数(CBC)和形态学报告,以进行绩效评估。通过使用05倍的训练程序查找IOU,个人培训,验证,测试精度和全球精度,使用与地面真相面具的交叉匹配分析评估了所提出的模型结果。该模型在Healthy-RBC数据集上获得了训练,验证和测试精度为0.9856、0.9760和0.9720,在肛门型RBC数据集上进行了0.9736、0.9736、0.9696和0.9591。拟议模型的IOU和BFSCORE分别为0.9311、0.9138和0.9032、0.8978,分别在健康和贫血数据集上。
Pixel-level analysis of blood images plays a pivotal role in diagnosing blood-related diseases, especially Anaemia. These analyses mainly rely on an accurate diagnosis of morphological deformities like shape, size, and precise pixel counting. In traditional segmentation approaches, instance or object-based approaches have been adopted that are not feasible for pixel-level analysis. The convolutional neural network (CNN) model required a large dataset with detailed pixel-level information for the semantic segmentation of red blood cells in the deep learning domain. In current research work, we address these problems by proposing a multi-level deep convolutional encoder-decoder network along with two state-of-the-art healthy and Anaemic-RBC datasets. The proposed multi-level CNN model preserved pixel-level semantic information extracted in one layer and then passed to the next layer to choose relevant features. This phenomenon helps to precise pixel-level counting of healthy and anaemic-RBC elements along with morphological analysis. For experimental purposes, we proposed two state-of-the-art RBC datasets, i.e., Healthy-RBCs and Anaemic-RBCs dataset. Each dataset contains 1000 images, ground truth masks, relevant, complete blood count (CBC), and morphology reports for performance evaluation. The proposed model results were evaluated using crossmatch analysis with ground truth mask by finding IoU, individual training, validation, testing accuracies, and global accuracies using a 05-fold training procedure. This model got training, validation, and testing accuracies as 0.9856, 0.9760, and 0.9720 on the Healthy-RBC dataset and 0.9736, 0.9696, and 0.9591 on an Anaemic-RBC dataset. The IoU and BFScore of the proposed model were 0.9311, 0.9138, and 0.9032, 0.8978 on healthy and anaemic datasets, respectively.