论文标题
纵向太阳突出振荡的摆模模型的扩展和验证
Extension and validation of the pendulum model for longitudinal solar prominence oscillations
论文作者
论文摘要
突出中的纵向振荡是太阳上的常见现象。这些振荡可用于推断细丝磁场的几何形状和强度。先前对纵向振荡的理论研究做出了两个简化的假设:支撑通量管的重力和半圆形倾角。但是,重力不是均匀的,逼真的倾角不是半圆形的。要了解包括非均匀太阳重力对纵向振荡的影响,并探索具有不同通量管几何形状的摆模型的有效性。我们首先得出描述血浆沿通量管运动的方程式,包括不均匀重力的影响,从而对原始的摆模型产生校正。我们还计算了正常模式的完整数值解,并将它们与新的摆近似值进行比较。我们发现,非均匀重力在摆模型中引入了显着的修饰。我们还发现了一个截止期,即纵向振荡的周期不能超过167分钟。另外,考虑到不同的管几何形状,该周期几乎完全取决于浸入底部的曲率半径。我们得出的结论是,非均匀的重力显着修饰了摆模型。这些校正对于突出的地震学很重要,因为曲率半径的推断值和最小磁场强度与旧模型的强度大不相同。但是,我们发现校正后的摆模型非常健壮,并且对于非圆倾角仍然有效。
Longitudinal oscillations in prominences are common phenomena on the Sun. These oscillations can be used to infer the geometry and intensity of the filament magnetic field. Previous theoretical studies of longitudinal oscillations made two simplifying assumptions: uniform gravity and semi-circular dips on the supporting flux tubes. However, the gravity is not uniform and realistic dips are not semi-circular. To understand the effects of including the nonuniform solar gravity on longitudinal oscillations, and explore the validity of the pendulum model with different flux-tube geometries. We first derive the equation describing the motion of the plasma along the flux tube including the effects of nonuniform gravity, yielding corrections to the original pendulum model. We also compute the full numerical solutions for the normal modes, and compare them with the new pendulum approximation. We have found that the nonuniform gravity introduces a significant modification in the pendulum model. We have also found a cut-off period, i.e. the longitudinal oscillations cannot have a period longer than 167 minutes. In addition, considering different tube geometries, the period depends almost exclusively on the radius of curvature at the bottom of the dip. We conclude that nonuniform gravity significantly modifies the pendulum model. These corrections are important for prominence seismology, because the inferred values of the radius of curvature and minimum magnetic-field strength differ substantially from those of the old model. However, we find that the corrected pendulum model is quite robust and is still valid for non-circular dips.