论文标题
High-Z无线电大型类星体的大型性质
Blazar nature of high-z radio-loud quasars
论文作者
论文摘要
我们报告了$ z> 4 $的11个Blazar候选人的Swift/XRT观察和分类。这些来源被选为极度无线电类星体样本的一部分,以便专注于以喷气机大约靠近我们视线的类星体。得出它们的视角和喷气机的大量洛伦兹因素对于严格的Blazar分类至关重要,仅由于X射线观察,才有可能。在11个来源中,有5个显示了强烈而坚硬的X射线通量,可以使它们的Blazar分类,两个不确定,三个宿主相对论喷气机,我们在其光束锥体外(即并不是严格的盛装),而一个人没有被Swift/XRT所发现。按照这种方法,我们能够追踪$> 10^9m_ \ odot $主动的超质量黑洞种群,该黑洞托有活性银河核。在$ z \ geq4 $上,大量喷气式来源可能在总体类星体种群中占主导地位:这需要深入审查我们对第一个超级质量黑洞的形成和进化的理解。喷气机确实是快速积聚的关键参与者,必须在整个高红移类星体种群中搜索。必须谨慎注意:高红移处的无线电和一般无线电特征似乎并不能完全反映高能特性。由于与CMB辐射的相互作用而产生的强大影响肯定是适当的,这会使无线电发射相对于X射线,但在此问题中,弯曲的情况也更频繁地弯曲似乎起着相关的作用。因此,必须仔细地进行分类和人群研究,以免与这些矛盾相混淆。
We report on the Swift/XRT observation and classification of eleven blazar candidates at $z>4$. These sources were selected as part of a sample of extremely radio-loud quasars, in order to focus on quasars with jets oriented roughly close to our line-of-sight. Deriving their viewing angles and their jets bulk Lorentz factors was crucial for a strict blazar classification, and it was possible only thanks to X-ray observations. Out of eleven sources, five show strong and hard X-ray fluxes, that allow their blazar classification, two are uncertain, three host relativistic jets that we observe just outside their beaming cone (i.e. are not strictly blazars), while one went undetected by Swift/XRT. Following this approach, we were able to trace the $>10^9M_\odot$ active supermassive black hole population hosted in jetted active galactic nuclei. At $z\geq4$ the massive jetted sources are likely predominant in the overall quasar population: this calls for a deep review of our understanding of the first supermassive black holes formation and evolution. Jets are indeed key actors in fast accretion, and must be searched for across the whole high redshift quasar population. A note of caution must be added: radio-loudness and in general radio features at high redshifts seem not to perfectly reflect high-energy properties. A strong effect due to interaction with CMB radiation is surely in place, that quenches the radio emission with respect to the X-rays, but also more frequent occasions for the jet to be bent seem to play a relevant role in this matter. Classifications and population studies thus must be carefully performed, in order not to be confused by these inconsistencies.