论文标题
中子星合并GW190425的数值相对性模拟:微物理和质量比效应
Numerical relativity simulations of the neutron star merger GW190425: microphysics and mass ratio effects
论文作者
论文摘要
GW190425是第二个重力波(GW)信号与高级LIGO和高级处女座检测器检测到的二元中子星(BNS)合并兼容。由于未发现电磁对应物,因此相关的Kilonova是否太昏暗,或者定位区域太宽仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。我们使用具有有限温度的数值 - 利用率仿真,状态(EOS)和中微子辐射的数值 - 差异模拟,模拟了28个BNS合并,并以GW190425的chirp质量为GW190425和质量比$ 1 \ LEQ Q \ LEQ 1.67 $。 GWS中发出的能量为$ \ Lessim 0.083 m _ {\ odot} c^2 $,峰值光度为$ 1.1-2.4 \ times 10^{58} {\ rm erg〜s^{ - 1}}}}/(1+q)^2 $。动态弹出和圆盘质量范围在$ 5 \ times 10^{ - 6} - \ sim 10^{ - 3} 〜m _ {\ odot} $和$ 10^{ - 5} -5.1〜m _ {\ odot} $中。与质量相等的二进制文件相比,不对称合并,尤其是与僵硬的EOS相比,请解脱更多的物质,并形成更重的盘。光盘的角动量为$ 8-10 m _ {\ odot} 〜gm _ {\ rm disc}/c $在$ m _ {\ rm disc} $中的三个数量级上。尽管核合成没有特殊性,但与GW170817事件相比,模拟的Kilonovae相对较暗。对于与GW190425兼容的距离,AB的幅度总是比$ \ sim20〜 {\ rm mag} $变暗的,对于$ b $,$ r $和$ k $ bands,kironovae与更多不对称的二进制室和更刺激的eos相关。我们建议,即使假设GW190425的天空位置有良好的覆盖范围,目前的广阔场调查几乎无法检测到Kilonova,并且由于缺乏检测而没有对二进制参数或EOS的牢固约束。
GW190425 was the second gravitational wave (GW) signal compatible with a binary neutron star (BNS) merger detected by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. Since no electromagnetic counterpart was identified, whether the associated kilonova was too dim or the localisation area too broad is still an open question. We simulate 28 BNS mergers with the chirp mass of GW190425 and mass ratio $1 \leq q \leq 1.67$, using numerical-relativity simulations with finite temperature, composition dependent nuclear equation of state (EOS) and neutrino radiation. The energy emitted in GWs is $\lesssim 0.083 M_{\odot} c^2$ with peak luminosity of $1.1-2.4 \times 10^{58} {\rm erg~s^{-1}}/(1+q)^2$. Dynamical ejecta and disc mass range between $5 \times 10^{-6} - \sim 10^{-3}~M_{\odot}$ and $10^{-5} - 0.1~M_{\odot}$, respectively. Asymmetric mergers, especially with stiff EOS, unbind more matter and to form heavier discs compared to equal mass binaries. The angular momentum of the disc is $8-10 M_{\odot}~GM_{\rm disc}/c$ over three orders of magnitude in $M_{\rm disc}$. While the nucleosynthesis shows no peculiarity, the simulated kilonovae are relatively dim compared with the GW170817 event. For distances compatible with GW190425, AB magnitudes are always dimmer than $\sim20~{\rm mag}$ for the $B$, $r$ and $K$ bands, with brighter kilonovae associated to more asymmetric binaries and stiffer EOS. We suggest that, even assuming a good coverage of GW190425's sky location, the kilonova could hardly have been detected by present wide-field surveys and no firm constraints on the binary parameters or EOS can be argued from the lack of the detection.