论文标题
直肠癌的辐射治疗计划的自动化
Automation of Radiation Treatment Planning for Rectal Cancer
论文作者
论文摘要
为了开发直肠癌的自动化工作流程,三维形成良好的放射治疗计划结合了深度学习(DL)孔径预测和前期规划算法。我们设计了一种算法来自动化临床工作流程,以便在现场领域进行计划。对555名患者进行了训练,验证和测试DL模型,以自动生成一级和增强场的光圈形状。网络输入是数字重建的X射线照相,总肿瘤体积(GTV)和Nodal GTV。一名医师以5分制(> 3个可以接受)为20例患者的每个孔径为每个孔径评分。然后开发了一种计划算法,以使用楔形和子场的组合创建均匀剂量。该算法迭代地识别热点体积,创建子字段并在没有用户干预的情况下优化光束重量。使用具有不同设置的临床光圈对20例患者进行了测试,由医生对由此产生的计划(4例计划/患者)进行了测试。端到端的工作流程通过医生对39名使用DL生成的孔径和计划算法进行了测试和评分。预测的孔的骰子得分分别为0.95、0.94和0.90,分别为侧面,外侧和升压场。 100%,95%和87.5%的后侧,外侧和升压孔分别为临床上可接受。在85%和50%的患者中,楔形和非缘计划在临床上是可以接受的。最终计划的热点剂量百分比从121%($ \ pm $ 14%)降低到处方剂量的109%($ \ pm $ 5%)。自动生成的光圈和优化现场计划的综合端到端工作流程为38/39(97%)的患者提供了可接受的计划。我们已经成功地自动化了临床工作流程,以为我们的机构生成放射疗法计划。
To develop an automated workflow for rectal cancer three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy treatment planning that combines deep-learning(DL) aperture predictions and forward-planning algorithms. We designed an algorithm to automate the clinical workflow for planning with field-in-field. DL models were trained, validated, and tested on 555 patients to automatically generate aperture shapes for primary and boost fields. Network inputs were digitally reconstructed radiography, gross tumor volume(GTV), and nodal GTV. A physician scored each aperture for 20 patients on a 5-point scale(>3 acceptable). A planning algorithm was then developed to create a homogeneous dose using a combination of wedges and subfields. The algorithm iteratively identifies a hotspot volume, creates a subfield, and optimizes beam weight all without user intervention. The algorithm was tested on 20 patients using clinical apertures with different settings, and the resulting plans(4 plans/patient) were scored by a physician. The end-to-end workflow was tested and scored by a physician on 39 patients using DL-generated apertures and planning algorithms. The predicted apertures had Dice scores of 0.95, 0.94, and 0.90 for posterior-anterior, laterals, and boost fields, respectively. 100%, 95%, and 87.5% of the posterior-anterior, laterals, and boost apertures were scored as clinically acceptable, respectively. Wedged and non-wedged plans were clinically acceptable for 85% and 50% of patients, respectively. The final plans hotspot dose percentage was reduced from 121%($\pm$ 14%) to 109%($\pm$ 5%) of prescription dose. The integrated end-to-end workflow of automatically generated apertures and optimized field-in-field planning gave clinically acceptable plans for 38/39(97%) of patients. We have successfully automated the clinical workflow for generating radiotherapy plans for rectal cancer for our institution.