论文标题

部分可观测时空混沌系统的无模型预测

Diffstar: A Fully Parametric Physical Model for Galaxy Assembly History

论文作者

Alarcon, Alex, Hearin, Andrew P., Becker, Matthew R., Chaves-Montero, Jonás

论文摘要

我们提出了Diffstar,这是星系中原位恒星形成历史(SFH)的平滑参数模型。 DIFFSTAR与用于解释观察到的星系的光谱能量分布(SED)的常规SFH模型不同,因为我们的模型是根据星系形成物理学的基本特征直接参数化的。 DIFFSTAR模型假设恒星形成是由于气体将气体积聚到银河系的暗物质光环中所增强的,并且在Diffstar的基础上是Halo质量组装的参数模型,Diffmah。我们包括最终转化为恒星的积分的参数化成分,$ε_{\ rm ms},$以及对于发生这种转换的时间表,$τ_{\ rm cons}; $ $ t diffstar的某些星系在时间$ t $ t _ _ {\ rm q}的零食经验中经历了一些频繁的事件。我们将Illustristng(TNG)和Universemachine(UM)模拟所预测的星系的SFH与Diffstar参数化相吻合,并表明我们的模型足够灵活,可以描述两个模拟中的平均恒星质量历史,这些模拟的精确度为$ \ sim0.1 $ dex的整个大多数COSMIC时间的精确度。我们使用DIFFSTAR将TNG与UM进行了共同的术语进行比较,发现:(i)相对于TNG,UM中的星形形成效率较低和爆发; (ii)UM中的星系具有较长的气体消耗时标,相对于TNG,$τ_ {\ rm cons} $; (iii)恢复活力的恒星形成无处不在,而淬火的TNG星系很少经历持续的恢复; (iv)在两个模拟中,$ε_ {\ rm MS} $,$τ_{\ rm cons} $的分布和$ t _ {\ rm q} $共享对Halo质量的共同特征依赖性,并与Halo组装历史记录具有显着相关性。 [简略]

We present Diffstar, a smooth parametric model for the in-situ star formation history (SFH) of galaxies. Diffstar is distinct from conventional SFH models that are used to interpret the spectral energy distribution (SED) of an observed galaxy, because our model is parametrized directly in terms of basic features of galaxy formation physics. The Diffstar model assumes that star formation is fueled by the accretion of gas into the dark matter halo of the galaxy, and at the foundation of Diffstar is a parametric model for halo mass assembly, Diffmah. We include parametrized ingredients for the fraction of accreted gas that is eventually transformed into stars, $ε_{\rm ms},$ and for the timescale over which this transformation occurs, $τ_{\rm cons};$ some galaxies in Diffstar experience a quenching event at time $t_{\rm q},$ and may subsequently experience rejuvenated star formation. We fit the SFHs of galaxies predicted by the IllustrisTNG (TNG) and UniverseMachine (UM) simulations with the Diffstar parameterization, and show that our model is sufficiently flexible to describe the average stellar mass histories of galaxies in both simulations with an accuracy of $\sim0.1$ dex across most of cosmic time. We use Diffstar to compare TNG to UM in common physical terms, finding that: (i) star formation in UM is less efficient and burstier relative to TNG; (ii) galaxies in UM have longer gas consumption timescales, $τ_{\rm cons}$, relative to TNG; (iii) rejuvenated star formation is ubiquitous in UM, whereas quenched TNG galaxies rarely experience sustained rejuvenation; and (iv) in both simulations, the distributions of $ε_{\rm ms}$, $τ_{\rm cons}$, and $t_{\rm q}$ share a common characteristic dependence upon halo mass, and present significant correlations with halo assembly history. [Abridged]

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源