论文标题

为现任和参与者的研发,创新和资本积累的生产力影响:追赶经济的观点

Productivity Implications of R&D, Innovation, and Capital Accumulation for Incumbents and Entrants: Perspectives from a Catching-up Economy

论文作者

Masso, Jaan, Tiwari, Amaresh K

论文摘要

我们研究爱沙尼亚的参赛者和现任者的研发,资本积累和创新产出的生产力含义。首先,与发达经济体相比,一小部分公司从事正式的研发,但创新的百分比更大。其次,尽管我们发现参赛者和任职者的生产力的R&D弹性没有差异,但创新输出的影响 - 其中许多是“进行,使用和相互作用”(DUI)创新模式的结果 - 参与者的影响较高。创新的参赛者比没有参与者的参赛者高21%至30%;现任人的相应数字为10%至13%。第三,尽管捕捉经济体的典型不利部门组成,但爱沙尼亚现任者是“科学和技术创新”(STI)活动的主要载体,与他们在将STI活动转化为生产力增长方面的发达经济体相媲美。第四,虽然发现通过资本积累来实现的技术变革在产生生产率增长方面比研发更有效,但对于从事R&D的公司而言,有效性更高。最后,我们的结果表明,在技术发达经济体中促进生产力增长的某些政策建议可能不适用于吸引经济体。

We study the productivity implications of R&D, capital accumulation, and innovation output for entrants and incumbents in Estonia. First, in contrast to developed economies, a small percentage of firm engage in formal R&D, but a much larger percentage innovate. Second, while we find no difference in the R&D elasticity of productivity for the entrants and incumbents, the impact of innovation output - many of which are a result of 'doing, using and interacting' (DUI) mode of innovation - is found to be higher for the entrants. Entrants who innovate are 21% to 30% more productive than entrants who do not; the corresponding figures for the incumbents are 10% to 13%. Third, despite the adverse sectoral composition typical of catching-up economies, Estonian incumbents, who are the primary carriers of 'scientific and technologically-based innovative' (STI) activities, are comparable to their counterparts in developed economies in translating STI activities into productivity gains. Fourth, while embodied technological change through capital accumulation is found to be more effective in generating productivity growth than R&D, the effectiveness is higher for firms engaging in R&D. Finally, our results suggest that certain policy recommendations for spurring productivity growth in technologically advanced economies may not be applicable for catching-up economies.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源