论文标题
因果分解分析的敏感性分析:评估对省略可变偏见的鲁棒性
Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Decomposition Analysis: Assessing Robustness Toward Omitted Variable Bias
论文作者
论文摘要
分解分析的一个关键目标是确定社会群体之间结果差异的因素(“调解人”)。在分解分析中,学术兴趣通常集中在估计如果我们设定一个与另一个社会群体相等的社会群体的调解人(例如,教育)分布相等的调解人(例如,教育)分布,将减少/保留多少差异(例如,黑人妇女和白人之间的健康差异)。但是,因果识别降低和剩余的差异取决于无省略的调解结果混淆的假设,这在经验上是不可经验检验的。因此,我们提出了一组灵敏度分析,以评估降低差异对可能的混杂的鲁棒性。我们根据回归系数和$ r^2 $值提供灵敏度分析技术。提出的技术是灵活的,可以解决在组状态之前和之后测得的未观察到的混杂。此外,基于$ r^2 $的灵敏度分析提供了对灵敏度参数的直接解释,也提供了报告研究结果鲁棒性的标准方法。尽管我们在分解分析的背景下介绍了灵敏度分析技术,但它们可以根据介入间接效应在任何调解环境中使用。
A key objective of decomposition analysis is to identify a factor (the 'mediator') contributing to disparities in an outcome between social groups. In decomposition analysis, a scholarly interest often centers on estimating how much the disparity (e.g., health disparities between Black women and White men) would be reduced/remain if we set the mediator (e.g., education) distribution of one social group equal to another. However, causally identifying disparity reduction and remaining depends on the no omitted mediator-outcome confounding assumption, which is not empirically testable. Therefore, we propose a set of sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of disparity reduction to possible unobserved confounding. We provide sensitivity analysis techniques based on regression coefficients and $R^2$ values. The proposed techniques are flexible to address unobserved confounding measured before and after the group status. In addition, $R^2$-based sensitivity analysis offers a straightforward interpretation of sensitivity parameters and a standard way to report the robustness of research findings. Although we introduce sensitivity analysis techniques in the context of decomposition analysis, they can be utilized in any mediation setting based on interventional indirect effects.