学术文献库

Conventional wisdom of materials modelling stipulates that both chemical composition and crystal structure are integral in the prediction of physical properties. However, recent developments challenge this by reporting accurate property-prediction machine learning (ML) frameworks using composition alone without knowledge of the local atomic environments or long-range order. To probe this behavior, we conduct a systematic comparison of supervised ML models built on composition only vs. composition plus structure features. Similar performance for property prediction is found using both models for compounds close to the thermodynamic convex hull. We hypothesize that composition embeds structural information of ground-state structures in support of composition-centric models for property prediction and inverse design of stable compounds.