论文标题
共同作者合作对研究的学术引用和社会关注
Collaboration Effect by Co-Authorship on Academic Citation and Social Attention of Research
论文作者
论文摘要
学术引用和社会关注衡量研究结果影响的不同维度。这两种措施彼此之间没有相关性，并且受许多因素的影响。这些因素包括研究领域，访问类型和共同创作。在这项研究中，量化了由于研究和访问类型的分类科学文章的共同创作而引起的影响的增加。为此，分析了2018年发表的总共244,880篇研究文章，直到2021年，引用和社会关注得到了分析。数据源为dimensions.ai，研究单位是经济学，历史和考古学以及数学的研究文章。作为主要结果，一小部分文章受到了引用的很大一部分和大多数社会关注。一般而言，引文和社会关注与合着者的数量相关。因此，共同作者的数量越大，在学术文章中被引用并在社交媒体上提到的可能性越大。引用和由于协作引起的社会关注的优势与出版物的访问类型无关。此外，尽管与额外的合着者的合作在引文和社会关注方面通常是积极的，但随着合着者的数量增加，这些积极影响会降低。
Academic citation and social attention measure different dimensions of the impact of research results. Both measures do not correlate with each other, and they are influenced by many factors. Among these factors are the field of research, the type of access, and co-authorship. In this study, the increase in the impact due to co-authorship in scientific articles disaggregated by field of research and access type, was quantified. For this, the citations and social attention accumulated until the year 2021 by a total of 244,880 research articles published in the year 2018, were analyzed. The data source was Dimensions.ai, and the units of study were research articles in Economics, History and Archaeology, and Mathematics. As the main results, a small proportion of the articles received a large part of the citations and most of the social attention. Both citations and social attention in-creased, in general, with the number of co-authors. Thus, the greater the number of co-authors, the greater the probability of being cited in academic articles and mentioned on social media. The advantage in citation and social attention due to collaboration is independent of the access type for the publication. Furthermore, although collaboration with an additional co-author is in general positive in terms of citation and social attention, these positive effects reduce as the number of co-authors increases.
