论文标题
非参数鉴定在群集观察研究中具有差异选择的因果关系
Nonparametric identification of causal effects in clustered observational studies with differential selection
论文作者
论文摘要
聚类的观察性研究(COS)设计与聚类随机试验的观察性研究对应。在COS中,将治疗分配给完整的组,并且该组中的所有单位都暴露于治疗中。但是,该处理是非随机分配的。 COSS在教育和卫生服务研究中很常见。在教育方面,可以对某些学校的所有学生进行治疗,但请其他学校的所有学生保留。在健康研究中,可以将治疗应用于医院或由同一医生治疗的患者组。在本手稿中,我们研究了聚类的观察性研究设计中因果效应的鉴定。我们专注于将单位选择与簇不同选择的前景,这是在单元的群集选择取决于簇的治疗分配时发生的。在COSS上现有的工作做出了一个隐含的假设,即排除差异选择的存在。我们得出了具有差异选择的设计的标识结果,并且与标准设计相比,具有差异集群选择的上下文需要不同的调整集。我们概述了有或没有差分选择的设计估计器。使用一系列模拟,我们概述了在差异选择中可能发生的偏差的大小。然后,我们提出了两个经验应用,重点是差异选择的可能性。
The clustered observational study (COS) design is the observational study counterpart to the clustered randomized trial. In a COS, a treatment is assigned to intact groups, and all units within the group are exposed to the treatment. However, the treatment is non-randomly assigned. COSs are common in both education and health services research. In education, treatments may be given to all students within some schools but withheld from all students in other schools. In health studies, treatments may be applied to clusters such as hospitals or groups of patients treated by the same physician. In this manuscript, we study the identification of causal effects in clustered observational study designs. We focus on the prospect of differential selection of units to clusters, which occurs when the units' cluster selections depend on the clusters' treatment assignments. Extant work on COSs has made an implicit assumption that rules out the presence of differential selection. We derive the identification results for designs with differential selection and that contexts with differential cluster selection require different adjustment sets than standard designs. We outline estimators for designs with and without differential selection. Using a series of simulations, we outline the magnitude of the bias that can occur with differential selection. We then present two empirical applications focusing on the likelihood of differential selection.