论文标题
对车辆色彩环境光的情感响应
Affective responses to chromatic ambient light in a vehicle
论文作者
论文摘要
这项研究研究了使用自我评估和脑电图（EEG）对车辆室内照明颜色的情感反应。该研究分为两节：第一届会议研究了环境照明颜色的潜力，第二次会议用于制定车载灯光颜色指南。每个会议都包括三十个主题。在第一届会议中，使用十七个形容词评估了四种照明颜色。结果，发现偏好，柔软，亮度和独特性是最能表征车辆内部照明大气特性的四个因素。根据脑电图数据，环境照明增加了人们的唤醒并降低了其α波。接下来的会议使用了上一届会议中提取的四个因素研究了更广泛的颜色。结果，蓝色和紫色的照明颜色在十种照明颜色中具有最高的偏好和独特性。绿色获得了中间偏好和高独特分数。中性白色凭借其出色的亮度和柔软度，也获得了中间偏好的等级。尽管获得较低的偏好等级，但暖色被认为是柔软的。红色是最不受欢迎的颜色，但其独特性和粗糙度得到了高度评价。预计这项研究将在车辆环境中提供有关情绪照明指南的基本理论，从而为制造商提供客观的基本原理。
This study investigates the emotional responses to the color of vehicle interior lighting using self-assessment and electroencephalography (EEG). The study was divided into two sessions: the first session investigated the potential of ambient lighting colors, and the second session was used to develop in-vehicle lighting color guidelines. Every session included thirty subjects. In the first session, four lighting colors were assessed using seventeen adjectives. As a result, 'Preference, Softness, Brightness, and Uniqueness were found to be the four factors that best characterize the atmospheric properties of interior lighting in vehicles. Ambient illumination, according to EEG data, increased people's arousal and lowered their alpha waves. The following session investigated a wider spectrum of colors using four factors extracted from the previous session. As a result, bluish and purplish lighting colors had the highest preference and uniqueness among ten lighting colors. Green received an intermediate preference and a high uniqueness score. With its great brightness and softness, Neutral White also achieved an intermediate preference rating. Despite receiving a low preference rating, warm colors were considered to be soft. Red was the least preferred color, but its uniqueness and roughness were highly rated. This study is expected to provide a basic theory on emotional lighting guidelines in the vehicle context, providing manufacturers with objective rationale.
