论文标题

非自我相似的亮度 - 温度关系和动态摩擦

Non self-similar Luminosity-temperature relation and dynamical friction

论文作者

Del Popolo, Antonino, Delliou, Morgan Le, Chan, Man Ho

论文摘要

通过考虑到动态摩擦的作用,我们恢复了前一篇论文\ citep {delpopolo2005}的结果,我们恢复了亮度 - 温度关系(LTR)。通过假设自相似性,获得了$ l \ propto t^ 2 $的缩放定律,观察表明,亮度和温度之间的关系更陡峭,$ {l \ propto t^ {\ simeq 3}} $。可以通过非重力过程(例如预热,超新星反馈和AGN的加热)来解释这种差异。在本文中,我们通过修改的标点平衡模型\ citep {cavaliere1999}研究了LTR,并考虑了动态摩擦,从而扩展了在\ citep {delpopolo2005}中找到的方法。结果是一个非自我相似的LTR,其弯曲处为$ \ simeq 2 $ kev,坡度为$ 2.76 \ pm 0.18 $在较大的能量下,$ 3.4 \ pm 0.18 $ 0.18 $在小于2 kev的能量上。该结果与XXL调查\ Citep {Giles2016}一致。此外,较小能量处的陡峭斜率与一些研究声称LTR在低质量端进一步陡峭的研究一致。我们还将模型的结果与400D组的样品进行了比较,发现与簇中的坡度相比,斜率略陡峭,即$ 3.35 \ pm 0.3 $,与\ citep {Zou2016}研究的400D组相一致,这给出了Slope $ 3.29 \ pm pm 0.33 $。

Extending the results of a previous paper \citep{DelPopolo2005}, by taking into account the role of dynamical friction, we recovered the luminosity-temperature relation (LTR). While by assuming self-similarity, a scaling law in which $L\propto T^2$ is obtained, observations show that the relation between luminosity and temperature is steeper, ${L \propto T^ {\simeq 3}}$. This difference can be explained in terms of energy input by non-gravitational processes, like pre-heating, supernovae feedback, and heating from AGN. In this paper, we studied the LTR by means of a modified version of the punctuated equilibria model \citep{Cavaliere1999}, taking into account in addition dynamical friction, thus extending the approach found in \citep{DelPopolo2005}. The result is a non-self-similar LTR with a bend at $\simeq 2$ keV, with a slope $2.76 \pm 0.18$ at larger energies and $3.4 \pm 0.18$ at energies smaller than 2 keV. This result is in agreement with the XXL survey \citep{Giles2016}. Moreover the steeper slopes at smaller energies is in agreement with some studies claiming a further steepening of the LTR at the low mass end. We also compared the results of our model with the 400d groups sample, finding that in groups the slope is slightly steeper than in clusters, %and namely $3.35 \pm 0.3$, in agreement with the \citep{Zou2016} study for the 400d groups sample, that gives a slope $3.29 \pm 0.33$.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源