论文标题

希格斯将其缩合为量子液体:与观测值的临界比较

The Higgs condensate as a quantum liquid: A critical comparison with observations

论文作者

Cea, Paolo

论文摘要

四维标量量子场理论的微不足道对希格斯机制的通常扰动实施提出了挑战性的问题。在本文的第一部分中,我们比较了琐碎的情景和重新统治的两环扰动理论,以确切而广泛的结果,从晶格上真实标量场理论的非扰动数值模拟。琐碎性和自发对称性的突破的建议与数值模拟非常吻合,而重变的扰动方法似乎与数值模拟结果造成了显着偏差。在本文的第二部分中,我们试图说明四维标量场理论的微不足道如何导致标准模型标量群体中自发的对称性破坏。我们展示了如何使我们如何在标准模型中开发HIGGS机制的物理图片。我们建议希格斯凝结物的行为就像一种相对论量子液体,导致两个希格斯玻色子的预防。光希格斯玻色子与125 GEV的新LHC窄共振非常相似。重的希格斯玻色子是一个相当广泛的共鸣,质量约为730 GEV。我们将我们的建议与完整的LHC运行2个数据进行了严格的比较,该数据由Atlas和CMS合作收集。我们没有发现ATLAS数据集中重型希格斯玻色子的令人信服的证据。另一方面,CMS完整运行2个数据显示证据证明了主衰减模式中的重型玻色子$ h \ rightarrow ww $,而在初步运行中,有2个数据的迹象,有暗示$ h \ rightarrow zz $在黄金通道中。我们还批判性地讨论了两个LHC实验之间差异的合理原因。

The triviality of four-dimensional scalar quantum field theories poses challenging problems to the usually adopted perturbative implementation of the Higgs mechanism. In the first part of the paper we compare the triviality scenario and the renormalised two-loop perturbation theory to precise and extensive results from non-perturbative numerical simulations of the real scalar field theory on the lattice. The proposal of triviality and spontaneous symmetry breaking turns out to be in good agreement with numerical simulations, while the renormalised perturbative approach seems to suffer significant deviations from the numerical simulation results. In the second part of the paper we try to illustrate how the triviality of four-dimensional scalar field theory leads, nevertheless, to the spontaneous symmetry breaking in the scalar sector of the Standard Model. We show how triviality allows us to develop a physical picture of the Higgs mechanism in the Standard Model. We suggest that the Higgs condensate behave like a relativistic quantum liquid leading to the prevision of two Higgs bosons. The light Higgs boson resembles closely the new LHC narrow resonance at 125 GeV. The heavy Higgs boson is a rather broad resonance with mass of about 730 GeV. We critically compare our proposal to the complete LHC Run 2 data collected by the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations. We do not find convincingly evidences of the heavy Higgs boson in the ATLAS datasets. On the other hand, the CMS full Run 2 data display evidences of a heavy Higgs boson in the main decay modes $H \rightarrow WW$, while in the preliminary Run 2 data there are hints of the decays $H \rightarrow ZZ$ in the golden channel. We also critically discuss plausible reasons for the discrepancies between the two LHC experiments.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源