论文标题
在情感事件中对微施组织的分析
Analysis of Microstate Organization During Emotional Events
论文作者
论文摘要
了解情感体验的动态是一个古老的问题。但是,对情感体验机制的清晰了解仍然很远。在提出的工作中,我们尝试使用使用多通道脑电图(EEG)的称为Microstate分析的良好方法来解决这个问题。我们记录了自发情感体验的大脑活动,而参与者正在观看多媒体情绪刺激。参与者自发感受到情感的时间持续时间,我们将其称为情感事件。对所有情绪事件进行微晶格分割,以计算微晶格集(MS)。然后比较情绪和非情感条件的计算出的统计参数和过渡概率。我们发现了一组MS(四个MS),用于彼此不同的情绪和非情感条件。我们观察到,MS1在情绪条件下具有更高的发生,持续时间和覆盖范围的价值。此外,对于情绪状况,向MS1的过渡更高。另一方面,对于非情绪(或中性)条件,向MS3的过渡更高。一组与中性条件相关的MS源位于涉及高级感觉特征处理的大脑区域。另一方面,对于情绪条件,MS1 \&MS2本地化为感觉特征处理区域,而MS3 \&MS4也位于与社会情感处理相关的区域。我们的结果暗示了建筑主义机制,该机制在情感体验期间从自下而上和自上而下的处理中做出了不对称的贡献。
Understanding the dynamics of emotional experience is an old problem. However, a clear understanding of the mechanism of emotional experience is still far away. In the presented work, we tried to address this problem using a well-established method called microstate analysis using multichannel electroencephalography (EEG). We recorded the brain activity of spontaneous emotional experiences while participants were watching multimedia emotional stimuli. The time duration where the participants spontaneously felt an emotion, we termed it an emotional event. Microstate segmentation is performed for all emotional events to calculate the set of microstates (MS). Followed by a comparison of calculated statistical parameters and transition probabilities for the emotional and non-emotional conditions. We found a set of MS (four MS) for emotional and non-emotional conditions that differ from each other. We observed that MS1 has a higher value of occurrence, duration and coverage for emotional conditions. In addition, the transition to MS1 for the emotional condition was higher. On the other hand, for non-emotion (or neutral) condition, transition to MS3 was higher. A set of MS related to neutral condition was source localized to brain regions involved in higher-level sensory feature processing. On the other hand, for emotional conditions, MS1 \& MS2 are localized to sensory feature processing regions, and MS3 \& MS4 are additionally localized to regions related to socio-emotional processing. Our results hint toward the constructionist mechanism, which has an asymmetric contribution from bottom-up and top-down processing during an emotional experience.