论文标题
具有共享微波驱动器的超导量子位的基带控制
Baseband control of superconducting qubits with shared microwave drives
论文作者
论文摘要
准确控制量子位是构建功能量子处理器的中心要求。对于当前的超导量子处理器,量子位的高保真控制主要基于独立校准的微波脉冲,这可能在频率,振幅和相位上彼此不同。通过这种控制策略,所需的物理来源可能具有挑战性,尤其是当考虑到大规模量子处理器时。受凯恩(Kane)提出的基于自旋量子计算的提议的启发,在这里,我们从理论上探索了仅具有共享和始终在微波炉驱动器的超导量子位的基带通量控制的可能性。在我们的策略中,默认情况下,在系统空转期间,量子差与驱动器远不相差,量子读数和基带通量控制的双Qubit Gates可以通过始终在线驱动器产生的最小影响来实现。相比之下,在工作期间,可以通过驱动器和单量门门进行共振而调整量子位。因此,只有基带通量脉冲和始终在共享微波驱动器中,可以实现通用量子控制。我们将此策略应用于量子架构,在量子架构中,可调节量子器通过可调耦合器耦合,分析表明高保真量子量子控制是可能的。此外,与微波控制相比,基带控制策略所需的物理资源(例如控制电子和冷冻系统中的冷却能力)所需的物理资源更少。更重要的是,可以采用基带通量控制的灵活性来解决超导Qubits的不均匀性问题,从而有可能实现多路复用和跨杆技术,从而控制了大量控制线的Qubits。因此,我们期望使用共享微波驱动器的基带控制可以帮助构建大规模的超导量子处理器。
Accurate control of qubits is the central requirement for building functional quantum processors. For the current superconducting quantum processor, high-fidelity control of qubits is mainly based on independently calibrated microwave pulses, which could differ from each other in frequencies, amplitudes, and phases. With this control strategy, the needed physical source could be challenging, especially when scaling up to large-scale quantum processors is considered. Inspired by Kane's proposal for spin-based quantum computing, here, we explore theoretically the possibility of baseband flux control of superconducting qubits with only shared and always-on microwave drives. In our strategy, qubits are by default far detuned from the drive during system idle periods, qubit readout and baseband flux-controlled two-qubit gates can thus be realized with minimal impacts from the always-on drive. By contrast, during working periods, qubits are tuned on resonance with the drive and single-qubit gates can be realized. Therefore, universal qubit control can be achieved with only baseband flux pulses and always-on shared microwave drives. We apply this strategy to the qubit architecture where tunable qubits are coupled via a tunable coupler, and the analysis shows that high-fidelity qubit control is possible. Besides, the baseband control strategy needs fewer physical resources, such as control electronics and cooling power in cryogenic systems, than that of microwave control. More importantly, the flexibility of baseband flux control could be employed for addressing the non-uniformity issue of superconducting qubits, potentially allowing the realization of multiplexing and cross-bar technologies and thus controlling large numbers of qubits with fewer control lines. We thus expect that baseband control with shared microwave drives can help build large-scale superconducting quantum processors.