论文标题
在流动性冲击下形成最佳银行间网络
Formation of Optimal Interbank Networks under Liquidity Shocks
论文作者
论文摘要
我们研究了银行通过现金储备以及对其他银行风险的项目的曝光率控制其流动性供应的模型中最佳银行网络的形成。每个银行项目的价值可能会突然下降,具体取决于其现金储备以及流动性冲击的发生和幅度。在两个不同的设置中,我们解决了整个系统范围的最佳控制问题,并获得了独特的最佳资本最佳分配的明确公式。在第一个分散的环境中,银行只是寻求最大化自己的预期公用事业。其次,中央计划者旨在最大化所有银行预期公用事业的总和。所得的两个网络在平衡中均表现出“核心外围”结构。但是,在分散的环境中,银行选择与集中式环境相比持有更少的现金储备,从而导致对流动性短缺的敏感性更大。随着系统大小的增长,我们表征了计划者最佳分配的行为。令人惊讶的是,相对福利差距是恒定的顺序。最后,我们得出了共同投资要求,使分散的系统能够达到计划者的最佳风险水平。在此过程中,我们发现网络核心中的银行受到最高共同投资要求 - 确保它们充分激励了大量现金储备。我们的分析可能会为监管机构对银行流动性储备的要求提供信息,这是在美国2023年的区域银行危机之后的辩论。
We study the formation of an optimal interbank network in a model where banks control both their supply of liquidity, through cash reserves, and their exposures to other banks' risky projects. The value of each bank's project may suddenly decline depending on their cash reserves and both the occurence and magnitude of liquidity shocks. In two distinct settings, we solve the system-wide optimal control problem and obtain explicit formulas for the unique optimal allocations of capital. In the first decentralized setting, banks seek only to maximize their own expected utility. Second, a central planner aims to maximize the sum of all banks' expected utilities. Both of the resulting networks exhibit a `core-periphery' structure in equilibrium. However, in the decentralized setting, banks elect to hold less cash reserves compared to the centralized setting, leading to greater susceptibility to liquidity shortages. We characterize the behavior of the planner's optimal allocation as the size of the system grows. Surprisingly, the relative welfare gap is of constant order. Finally, we derive co-investment requirements that allow the decentralized system to achieve the planner's optimal level of risk. In doing so, we find that banks in the network's core are subjected to the highest co-investment requirements -- ensuring that they are sufficiently incentivized to hold significant cash reserves. Our analysis may inform regulators' requirements on banks' liquidity reserves, as have been debated in the wake of the 2023 regional banking crisis in the US.