论文标题
手呼吸:手掌对呼吸异常的非接触式监测
Hand-breathe: Non-Contact Monitoring of Breathing Abnormalities from Hand Palm
论文作者
论文摘要
在COVID19世界的世界中,基于射频(RF)的非接触方法,例如,基于软件定义的收音机(SDR)方法已成为有前途的人类生命值智能遥感的有前途的候选者,并且可以帮助遏制诸如COVID19之类的传染性病毒。为此,这项工作利用了通用软件无线电外围设备(USRP)的SDR以及经典的机器学习(ML)方法来设计一种非接触式方法来监视不同的呼吸异常。在我们提出的方法下,一个受试者将他/她的手放在发射天线和接收天线之间的桌子上,而正交频给(OFDM)信号通过手通过手。随后,接收器提取通道频率响应(基本上是细粒的无线通道状态信息),并将其馈送到各种ML算法中,这些算法最终将不同的呼吸异常分类。在所有分类器中,线性SVM分类器的最大精度为88.1 \%。为了以监督的方式培训ML分类器,通过对实验室环境中的4个受试者进行实时实验来收集数据。为了产生标签,对受试者的呼吸分为三类:正常,快速和缓慢的呼吸。此外,除了我们提出的方法(只有一只手接触RF信号的方法)外,我们还实施并测试了最先进的方法(其中全胸会暴露于RF辐射)。这两种方法的性能比较表明,与基准方法相比,我们提出的方法的准确性略有较低,但我们所提出的方法的准确性略有较低,但我们的方法导致身体接触RF辐射的最小暴露。
In post-covid19 world, radio frequency (RF)-based non-contact methods, e.g., software-defined radios (SDR)-based methods have emerged as promising candidates for intelligent remote sensing of human vitals, and could help in containment of contagious viruses like covid19. To this end, this work utilizes the universal software radio peripherals (USRP)-based SDRs along with classical machine learning (ML) methods to design a non-contact method to monitor different breathing abnormalities. Under our proposed method, a subject rests his/her hand on a table in between the transmit and receive antennas, while an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signal passes through the hand. Subsequently, the receiver extracts the channel frequency response (basically, fine-grained wireless channel state information), and feeds it to various ML algorithms which eventually classify between different breathing abnormalities. Among all classifiers, linear SVM classifier resulted in a maximum accuracy of 88.1\%. To train the ML classifiers in a supervised manner, data was collected by doing real-time experiments on 4 subjects in a lab environment. For label generation purpose, the breathing of the subjects was classified into three classes: normal, fast, and slow breathing. Furthermore, in addition to our proposed method (where only a hand is exposed to RF signals), we also implemented and tested the state-of-the-art method (where full chest is exposed to RF radiation). The performance comparison of the two methods reveals a trade-off, i.e., the accuracy of our proposed method is slightly inferior but our method results in minimal body exposure to RF radiation, compared to the benchmark method.