论文标题
部分可观测时空混沌系统的无模型预测
The density and pressure of helium nano-bubbles encapsulated in silicon
论文作者
论文摘要
储层计算是预测湍流的有力工具,其简单的架构具有处理大型系统的计算效率。然而,其实现通常需要完整的状态向量测量和系统非线性知识。我们使用非线性投影函数将系统测量扩展到高维空间,然后将其输入到储层中以获得预测。我们展示了这种储层计算网络在时空混沌系统上的应用,该系统模拟了湍流的若干特征。我们表明,使用径向基函数作为非线性投影器,即使只有部分观测并且不知道控制方程,也能稳健地捕捉复杂的系统非线性。最后,我们表明,当测量稀疏、不完整且带有噪声,甚至控制方程变得不准确时,我们的网络仍然可以产生相当准确的预测,从而为实际湍流系统的无模型预测铺平了道路。
The $1s^2->1s2p(^1P)$ excitation in confined and compressed helium atoms in either the bulk material or encapsulated in a bubble is shifted to energies higher than that in the free atom. For bulk helium, the energy shifts predicted from non-empirical electronic structure computations are in excellent agreement with the experimentally determined values. However, there are significant discrepancies both between the results of experiments on different bubbles and between these and the well established descriptions of the bulk. A critique is presented of previous attempts to determine the densities in bubbles by measuring the intensities of the electrons inelastically scattered in STEM experiments. The reported densities are untrustworthy because it was assumed that the cross section for inelastic electron scattering was the same as that of a free atom whilst it is now known that this property is greatly enhanced for atoms confined at significant pressures. It is shown how experimental measurements of bubbles can be combined with data on the bulk using a graphical method to determine whether the behavior of an encapsulated guest differs from that in the bulk material. Experimental electron energy loss data from an earlier study of helium encapsulated in silicon is reanalyzed using this new method to show that the properties of the helium in these bubbles do not differ significantly from those in the bulk thereby enabling the densities in the bubbles to be determined. These enable the bubble pressures to be deduced from a well established experimentally derived equation of state. It is shown that the errors of up to 80% in the incorrectly determined densities are greatly magnified in the predicted pressures which can be too large by factors of over seven. This has major practical implications for the study of radiation damage of materials exposed to $α$ particle bombardment.