论文标题
解释实验性临界电流密度和超导体的悬浮,以及保护超导体免受淬火的第二温度极限
Interpretation of experimental Critical Current Density and Levitation of Superconductors, and a second Temperature Limit to protect Superconductors against Quench
论文作者
论文摘要
重新审视了最近引入的数值模型,以计算超导体的松弛率和放松时间。需要放松时间来重组后,将超导体的电子系统重组为新的动态平衡。这个想法是将该模型扩展到文献中报道的实验结果的评估临界电流密度,jcrit,悬浮高度和力,用于稳定性函数,持续电流以及原则上,以检查所有依赖JCRIT的可观察物。只有在放松过程完成后,才能独特地验证实验,依赖JCRIT的结果。在第二部分中,使用相同的数值模型,本文作为推论,研究了临界电流密度与电子对浓度之间的相关性。作为亮点,它表明存在第二个“临界”温度,即在高温超导体中低于标准临界温度的温度下的tquench。如果在干扰下样品温度升高到T> tquench,则在给定的过程时间内可能无法完成超导体的电子系统对新的动态平衡的松弛。然后,关键电流密度无法发展到其潜在的可能,全价,jcrit(t)以提供零损失的电流传输。在干扰下电子对衰减之后,为什么衰减产物应该完全动机重组(放松)到电子对?为了回答这个问题,该论文最终将熵差异作为放松的驱动力,并研究了熵生产和放松过程之间可能存在的相关性。
A recently introduced numerical model to calculate relaxation rates and relaxation time of superconductors is revisited. Relaxation time is needed to reorganise, after a disturbance, the electron system of the superconductor to new dynamic equilibrium. The idea is to extend this model to evaluation of experimental results reported in the literature for critical current density, JCrit, for levitation height and force, for stability functions, persistent currents, and, in principle, for a check of all observables that depend on JCrit. It is only after completion of the relaxation process that experimental, JCrit-dependent results can be verified uniquely. In its second part, using the same numerical model, this paper, as a corollary, investigates correlation between densities of critical current and concentration of electron pairs. As a highlight, it suggests existence of a second "critical" temperature, TQuench, expected at temperature below standard critical temperature in a High Temperature Superconductor. If under a disturbance sample temperature increases to T > TQuench, relaxation of the electron system of the superconductor to a new dynamic equilibrium might not be completed within given process time. Critical current density then cannot develop to its potentially possible, full value, JCrit(T), to provide zero-loss current transport. After decay of electron pairs under disturbances, why should the decay products at all be motivated to re-combine (relax) to electron pairs? To answer this question, the paper finally calculates entropy differences as the driving force for relaxation, and it investigates a probably existing correlation between entropy production and relaxation process.